Attribute-Based Methods

By T. Holmes, Wiktor L. Adamowicz. 2003

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/979411e9a96cc411bb611f4af3210f1c208b3053

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions (2005, methodology): “Rather than focusing attention on a total, or “holistic,” value as is done in standard CV, ABMs focus attention on a set of attributes, including the cost, that have management or policy relevance (Adamowicz, Louviere, and Swait 1998; Bennett and Blamey 2001).”
Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change (2009, background): “However, unlike the single shot CV approach, reliance upon the CE approach places the survey respondent within a context where they make repeated trade-offs between different specifications of the non-market good and alternative prices (Adamowicz et al., 1999; Louviere et al., 2000; Louviere, 2001; ”
Valuing Beach Access and Width with Revealed and Stated Preference Data (2008, methodology): “Choice experiments are a stated preference approach that involves respondent choices among hypothetical scenarios with various characteristics, including cost (Holmes and Adamowicz 2003).”
Valuation of cancer and microbial disease risk reductions in municipal drinking water: An analysis of risk context using multiple valuation methods (2011, methodology): “We employ two nonmarket valuation methods for eliciting information about consumer preferences for avoiding public health risks from the public good “tap water”: CVM and AB (Adamowicz et al. 1998; Holmes and Adamowicz 2003).”
Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration (2004, methodology): “For a discussion of this issue, see Holmes and Adamowicz (2003). were identified: (1) habitat for fish (abundance of game fish), (2) habitat for wildlife (wildlife habitat in buffer zones), (3) erosion control and water purification (water clarity), (4) recreational uses (allowable water uses), and ”
Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study (2007, methodology): “This is the basis for the proposed term of ‘attribute-based stated preference’ method [34].”
Altruism Spillovers: Are Behaviors in Context-Free Experiments Predictive of Altruism Toward a Naturally Occurring Public Good? (2008, unknown): “…format of the choice experiment follows a standard choice-modeling (conjoint) format that is commonly used to elicit values for non-marketed, public goods (see Holmes and Adamowicz 2003 and Hanley et al. 1998 for a discussion of choice experiments and their use in valuation of environmental goods).”
Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates (2007, background): “The advantage of the RPL model is that the heterogeneity in the sample can be captured by estimating the mean and variance of the random parameter distribution ( Holmes and Adamowicz 2003 ).”
Using Recreation Specialization to Understand Multi-Attribute Management PReferences (2006, background): “Based on the assumption that parameters are randomly distributed in the population, a distribution for parameter estimates such as commonly normal or lognormal distribution is specified (Holmes & Adamowicz, 2003; Train, 2003).”