International benefit transfer: Methods and validity tests

By R. Ready, S. Navrud. 2006

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ad8a12e140dab222ff363f6639b19e04967ef78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Henrik Lindhjem
2. S. Navrud

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Henrik Lindhjem
2. Onno Kuik
3. Luke Brander
4. S. Navrud
5. Anil Markandya

Citations in the corpus

• Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands (2012, background): “Although some studies find very high transfer errors (e.g. Downing and Ozuna 1996; Kirchhoff 1998), most studies find transfer errors in the range of 0–100% even in international value transfers (Ready and Navrud 2006).”
• How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers? (2008, methodology): “To make WTP from different countries comparable, estimates from Sweden and Finland were converted to NOK at the year of the survey using annual average OECD PPP rates, and then adjusted to 2005 by use of the Norwegian consumer price index (CPI).”