Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual

By T. Laitila. 2004

972 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/550056457c60ccd22a6d20f2dedb5262446c8f03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Katrin Rehdanz
2. David J. Maddison
3. C. Spash
4. C. Oh
5. A. Rogers
6. Roy Brouwer
7. R. Ditton
8. G. Atkinson

Citations in the corpus

• Using Recreation Specialization to Understand Multi-Attribute Management PReferences (2006, background): “, preferences inferred from simulation of anglers’ future behavioral decisions) should help improve predictive validity (Adamowicz, Swait, Boxall, Louviere, & Williams, 1997; Bateman et al., 2002; Louviere et al., 2000).”
• Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe (2011, methodology): “8 See the online version of this paper for a colour reproduction of this Figure or download Hime et al. (2009) at http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/edm/edm_2009_01.pdf ladder while the quality of improved stretches was specified as attaining the blue level.”
• Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science (2008, neutral): “The contingent valuation method is a stated preference approach that directly elicits willingness (and ability) to pay statements from survey respondents (Mitchell and Carson, 1989; Bateman et al., 2003).”
• Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach (2010, methodology): “In common with other stated preference techniques CVM estimates are prone to various types of bias (Bateman et al., 2002: pp. 296–342; Venkatachalam, 2004: pp. 90–117).”
• Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis (2008, background): “(9), Mitchell & Carson (10); Bateman & Willis (27)].”
• Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity (2015, background): “In addition, there might be a trade-off between stressing the roles biodiversity plays for human well-being, its ‘functionality’ (Bakhtiari et al., 2014), and using quantifiable attributes, as recommended, e.g., by Bateman et al. (2004) 14 .”
• Business partner or simple catch? The economic value of the sicklefin lemon shark in French Polynesia (2011, neutral): “Limitations include the subjectiveness of human perceptions involved in the process, which prevents one from being able to accurately replicate a study (Boardman et al. 2001; Bateman et al. 2002).”
• Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change (2009, background): “While many non-market valuation manuals focus strongly upon the accuracy of information provided to survey respondents (e.g. Bateman et al., 2002), an increasing concern is the comprehension (Boyle, 2003; Mathews et al., 2006) or ‘evaluability’ of that information (Hsee 1996a, 1996b; 1998).”
• Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Meta-Regression Analysis (2015, methodology): “Stated preference techniques that are predominately applied to identify preferences for RE are: choice experiments - which elicits the value of the characteristics of a good - and contingent valuation - which values the good as a whole (Bateman et al. (2002).”
• The value of a statistical life (2009, neutral): “Instead we refer to the references provided in this section, in which many econometric aspects are discussed, together with other literature on non-market valuation (e.g., Bateman et al., 2002; Haab and McDonnel, 2003) as well as textbooks on econometrics (e.g., Wooldridge, 2002, 2003).”
• The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: Willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy (2008, neutral): “4 Bateman et al. (2002) suggest that not more than 4-5 attributes, including price, should be presented in a choice experiments-based questionnaire.”
• Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in Germany (2008, methodology): “The contingent valuation method is often criticized because of the difficulties related to the construction of a market and its numerous potential biases (see Mitchell and Carson, 1989 or Bateman et al., 2002, for a more recent overview of the method).”
• Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements (2006, background): “CVM experts then recommend removing such responses from the sample as representing “ethical protesting” (Bateman et al. 2002, 276).”
• “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions (2008, background): “In order to measure the effect of the suggested changes on people's welfare, respondents are typically asked for either their willingness to pay (WTP) or their willingness to accept (WTA) compensation for the gains or losses involved (Mitchell and Carson 1989; Bateman et al. 2002).”