How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?

By Henrik Lindhjem, S. Navrud. 2008

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46ba024e202a9df3eb5ca2ff2360a5873e206c67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments (2011, background): “…al., 1996; Desvousges et al., 1992; Downing and Ozuna, 1996; Johnstone and Duke, 2009; Johnston et al., 2005, 2006; Leon-Gonzalez and Scarpa, 2008; Lindhjem and Navrud, 2008; Moeltner et al., 2007; Muthke and Holm-Mueller, 2004; Navrud and Ready, 2007; Ready et al., 2004; TEEB, 2009; Zandersen et…”
A Global Map of Coastal Recreation Values: Results from a Spatially Explicit Meta-Analysis (2011, unknown): “Unlike Lindhjem & Navrud (2008) we found evidence in support of meta-analytical value transfer in higher transfer accuracy for the meta-regression models compared to simple unit transfer methodologies.”
The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment (2009, unknown): “Although meta-analysis has seen widespread use, this has not been without criticism (e.g., Berk 2007; Elvik 2005; Goldfarb and Stekler 2002; Lindhjem and Navrud 2008; 23 Clustering software is another way of producing the estimates presented above for hierarchical/multilevel and panel data.”
Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe (2011, methodology): “Where these differences are 1 For ease of exposition we omit discussion of parallel approaches such as meta-analysis (e.g. Bateman and Jones 2003; Lindhjem and Navrud 2008) and Bayesian approaches to modelling value functions (e.g. Moeltner et al. 2007; Leon-Gonzalez and Scarpa 2008). relatively…”
METHODS, TRENDS AND CONTROVERSIES IN CONTEMPORARY BENEFIT TRANSFER (2009, unknown): “Compared to domestic transfers, international transfers may face additional challenges related to study heterogeneity, data poolability, value surface homogeneity and divergent sample selection considerations (Lindhjem and Navrud, 2008; Rosenberger and Johnston, 2009).”
Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity (2012, methodology): “include meta-analysis (e.g. Bateman and Jones, 2003; Lindhjem and Navrud, 2008) and Bayesian approaches”