Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety.

By Boris Egloff, S. Schmukle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002

660 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2737a463bd6ee312d023e4ee2274e61ee98320e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Control me or I will control you: Impulses, trait self-control, and the guidance of behavior (2009, background): “They are greatly influenced by automatic processes (Conrey, Sherman, Gawronski, Hugenberg, & Groom, 2005; Payne, 2005) and research has shown that it is much more difficult to strategically influence these measures than traditional self-report measures (Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Steffens, 2004).”
A COGNITIVE SKILL CONFOUND ON THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST (2002, background): “, gaze aversion, tense body posture) in a get–acquainted session; Egloff and Schmulke (2002) showed that an IAT associating the self and anxiety predicted nervous body language (e.”
The effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations (2010, neutral): “…to context effects and predictive utility is well established (Blair, 2002; Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlmann, & Banaji, 2009), and it is relatively free from social desirability bias and other types of distortion (Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Foroni & Mayr, 2005; Kim, 2003).”
Predictive Validity of the Implicit Association Test in Studies of Brands, Consumer Attitudes, and Behavior (2004, positive): “This conclusion fits with findings of other studies that have indicated independence in predictions of behavior by IAT and explicit measures (e.g., Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; McConnell & Leibold, 2001).”
Development of Indirect Measures of Conscientiousness: Combining a Facets Approach and Network Analysis (2015, background): “…et al., 2009; Grumm & von Collani, 2007; Schmukle, Back & Egloff, 2008; Steffens & König, 2006) along with specific traits such as shyness (Asendorpf, Banse & Mücke, 2002), anxiety (Egloff & Schmukle, 2002), morality (Perugini & Leone, 2009) and aggressiveness (Richetin, Richardson & Mason, 2010).”
Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “Responses on implicit measures are comparatively difficult to control unless the person is explicitly instructed on how to do this (e.g., Asendorpf, Banse, & Mücke, 2002; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Fiedler & Bluemke, 2005; Steffens, 2004).”
Faking of the Implicit Association Test Is Statistically Detectable and Partly Correctable (2010, background): “In the three Fiedler and Bluemke’s (2005) studies, this was Index a, and in the Brown, Gray, & Snowden study (see Brown, 2005) the next”
Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. (2005, background): “emotional concerns of both groups. However, while such attentional bias operates rapidly in anxiety, occurring even under exposure conditions that restrict stimulus awareness, it is evident in depression only when more time is permitted for stimulus processing. For example, Mathews et al. (1996) rep”
Personality development: stability and change. (2005, background): “For example, implicit measures have been used to assess anxiety and shyness in adults (Asendorpf et al. 2002, Egloff & Schmukle 2002); rather than directly inquiring about a person’s self-view of personality, these instruments A nn u.”
Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests (2005, background): “A few exceptional studies (Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Kim, 2003) have not directly encouraged participants to fake and have not solicited instrumental strategies to shift test scores in a specific direction.”
Why do Westerners self‐enhance more than East Asians? (2009, background): “…on the IAT (with other attitudes) can be faked by savvy participants and may not be indicative of only automatic processes (Conrey, Sherman, Gawronski, Hugenberg, & Groom, 2005; Fiedler, & Bluemke, 2005; Kim, 2003; Steffens, 2004; see also Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002).”
Implicit self-concept and moral action (2009, background): “…spontaneous behaviors relatively unaffected by self-presentation biases have been uniquely predicted by these implicit personality measures (Asendorpf et al., 2002; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002); while explicit self-report trait measures have been linked to more deliberate and reactive criteria.”
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, positive): “…two factors – experience with the IAT and explicit instructions about how to control IAT scores – increase fakeability (Asendorpf, Banse, & Mucke, 2002; Asendorpf, Banse, & Schnabel, 2006; Banse, Seise, & Zerbes, 2001; Egloff & Schmukle, 2002; Kim, 2003; Perugini & Leone, 2004; Steffens, 2004).”