Martijn van Zomeren

Sociology and Political Science · 2004–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 69 researchers and is trusted by 52 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 140 citations into it; #788 of 22,756 by trust here, #412 by citations
• Social Psychology — 95 citations into it; #802 of 15,694 by trust here, #521 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 33 citations into it; #3,258 of 10,852 by trust here, #5,844 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 24 citations into it; #1,344 of 3,868 by trust here, #607 by citations
• Gender Studies — 20 citations into it
• Political Science and International Relations — 15 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 10 citations into it
• Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 9 citations into it

Whom Martijn van Zomeren trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Linda J. Skitka
2. J. Drury
3. Russell Spears
4. C. Leach
5. Tom Postmes
6. A. Iyer
7. D. Mackie
8. Winnifred R. Louis
9. Stephen C. Wright
10. Stephen D. Reicher

Who trusts Martijn van Zomeren overall

1. J. Becker
2. Emma F. Thomas
3. Nicole Tausch
4. Winnifred R. Louis
5. Karen R. S. Hamann
6. Russell Spears
7. Mei‐Fang Chen
8. Anna Wlodarczyk
9. Smadar Cohen‐Chen
10. Jacquelien van Stekelenburg

Papers from Martijn van Zomeren's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Martijn van Zomeren trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
2. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models (Behavior Research Methods)
3. Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
4. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
5. Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching Crowds and Power
6. A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity
7. Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness
8. A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating theory, research, and applications.
9. Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action
10. The Next Generation of Collective Action Research

Their papers

• Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. (2008) — 2,455 citations
• Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. (2008) — 1,735 citations
• Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. (2004) — 1,034 citations
• Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action (2009) — 283 citations
• Four Core Social‐Psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action (2013) — 276 citations
• Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? (2011) — 271 citations
• Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship (2010) — 205 citations
• Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis (2010) — 214 citations
• Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action (2013) — 222 citations
• Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating Core Motivations and Features of Social Structure into the Political Psychology of Political Action (2016) — 93 citations
• Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high (2018) — 144 citations
• Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion- and problem-focused coping functions (2019) — 138 citations
• Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (2018) — 242 citations