A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating theory, research, and applications.

By Ira J. Roseman. 2001

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81a3f4b542e7eb7ee9af632eb143e869454a1985

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course (2012, background): “emotion research (e.g., DeSteno et al. 2004; Roseman 2001).”
Teachers' Emotion Regulation and Classroom Management (2009, background): “…anger typically involves the judgment or appraisal that someone is to blame for a blocked goal, an arrogant entitlement, or unfairness, whereas frustration involves the appraisal that circumstances rather than individuals are to blame (Kuppens, Van Mechelen, Smits, & De Boreck 2003; Roseman, 2001).”
The Validity of the MSCEIT: Additional Analyses and Evidence (2012, background): “The STEU is scored veridically: The authors claim there is a correct and incorrect answer for each question, determined by theory (Roseman, 2001)—an approach that Maul says he prefers.”
Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Exploring the role of attachment and perceptions of personal injury (2005, unknown): “Many the-orists (e.g., Roseman, 2001) view surprise as an orienting response, rather than an emotion (a position supported by the fact that surprise applies to both positive and negative events).”
The inner speech of behavioral regulation: Intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a You (2014, background): “Common appraisal dimensions include, for example, evaluating interest, pleasantness/happiness/enjoyment, and available resources for dealing with an event, and appraising events as relevant or important (Lazarus, 1991; Roseman, 2001; Scherer, 2001).”
Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis (2010, background): “Modern emotion theories have explored a number of cognitive appraisals as potential antecedents of emotions including valence, goal congruency, goal conduciveness, expectedness, controllability, and normative significance (Roseman 2001; Scherer 2001).”
The self in self-conscious emotions: A cognitive appraisal approach. (2007, background): “…(e.g., Covington & Omelich, 1981; Jagacinski & Nicholls, 1984; Weiner, 1985); cognitive appraisals and emotions (e.g., Lazarus, 1991; Scherer, 2001; Roseman, 2001; Ellsworth & Smith, 1988); the cognitive antecedents of shame, guilt, and pride (e.g., M. Lewis, 2000; H. B. Lewis, 1971; Tangney,…”
An appraisal account of individual differences in emotional experience (2010, methodology): “In addition, appraisal theorists have also postulated emotion-specific appraisal styles, such as an anger-prone style and a guilt-prone style, in which events are chronically appraised in ways that encourage anger and guilt experiences, respectively (Roseman, 2001).”
Control-value appraisals, achievement emotions, and foreign language performance: A latent interaction analysis (2020, background): “However, as long asserted by appraisal theorists, specific emotional experiences depend on combinations of discrete appraisals rather than single appraisals alone (Roseman, 2001).”
Antecedents and Effects of Teachers’ Emotional Experiences: An Integrated Perspective and Empirical Test (2009, background): “Among others, the most frequently referenced appraisals include goal congruence (also referred to as valence), goal conduciveness , coping potential (also referred to as control), accountability (also referred to as agency or locus of causation), and goal significance (e.g., Ellsworth and Scherer 20”
Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. (2008, unknown): “Smith, 1993), which, in line with appraisal theories of emotion (e.g., Frijda, 1986; Lazarus, 1991, 2001; Roseman, 2001; Scherer, 1984, 2001; C. A. Smith & Ellsworth, 1985; for an overview, see Scherer, Schorr, & Johnstone, 2001), proposes that group-based emotions such as anger form a conceptual br”
The Importance of Being Emotional : How do Emotions Affect Entrepreneurial Opportunity Evaluation and Exploitation? (2010, methodology): “Following current appraisal theories, cognitions (opinion, belief and judgment) are believed to play a central role in the formation of emotions (e.g. Lazarus, 1991; Roseman, 2001; Barsade and Gibson, 2007).”
Artistic Training and Interest in Visual Art: Applying the Appraisal Model of Aesthetic Emotions (2006, background): “A goal of appraisal research is to specify each emotion’s appraisal structure (Roseman, 2001; Scherer, 2001).”
Toward a Process-Based Approach of Conceptualizing Change Readiness (2013, background): “Although affective pathways have received considerably less attention, some research suggests the role of positive emotions as reflecting approach-based motivation under goal-congruent situations (Roseman, 2001).”