Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy.

By Martijn van Zomeren, Russell Spears, Agneta H. Fischer, C. Leach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004

1,034 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca20de3504e3d74faec96ed4f70340e3a0860191

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Collective Action—and Then What? (2009, background): “…Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004); collective effectiveness, or success in achieving group goals (e.g., Klandermans, 1997; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987); and collective emotions such as anger (e.g., Iyer, Shmader, & Lickel, 2007; van Zomeren et al., 2004).”
A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers (2015, methodology): “…feel that their group does not have access to the conventional channels of political influence (e.g., Wright, 2009; Wright et al., 1990), is marginalised in the existing political system (e.g., Schwarzmantel, 2010), or is too disorganised or unsupportive of the cause (see van Zomeren et al., 2004).”
The Relative Impact of Anger and Efficacy on Collective Action is Affected by Feelings of Fear (2009, background): “…as resentment and anger has received considerable research attention (Grant & Brown, 1995; Guimond & Dube-Simard, 1983; Tougas & Veilleux, 1988; van Zomeren et al., 2004), almost no work has examined the relationship between fear and collective action (for an exception, see Smith et al., 2008).”
Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics (2009, background): “Indeed, instrumental motives were fully translated into efficacy (cf. Simon et al., 1998; van Zomeren et al., 2004), but only so in the context of power-oriented protest.”
Images that Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures (2018, background): “Turning to the specific role of anger, in the context of social movement participation, Van Zomeren and colleagues found in a set of experiments that students feeling angry were more likely to join demonstrations against an increment of tuition fees in the Netherlands (van Zomeren et al. 2004).”
Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and Processes (2015, background): “…X Tarrant et al. (2009) X Tausch et al. (2011) X Tropp (2003) X Van der Schalk et al. (2011) X Van Leeuwen et al. (2013) X Van Zomeren et al. (2007) X Van Zomeren et al. (2004) X Wang et al. (2013) X Weisbuch and Ambady (2008) X Wohl and Branscombe (2005) X Wohl and Branscombe (2008) X Wohl…”
Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. (2008, methodology): “…of an intergroup event (e.g., injustice) determine specific group-based emotions (e.g., anger or resentment) that, in turn, predict specific action tendencies (e.g., wanting to confront those responsible; see Mackie, Devos, & Smith, 2000; Van Zomeren et al., 2004; Yzerbyt et al., 2003).”
Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action (2009, background): “Similarly, people may perceive their group to be too weak to enforce social change (in terms of the group’s efficacy to achieve change; Mummendey et al., 1999; van Zomeren et al., 2004).”
Constructing Indignation: Anger Dynamics in Protest Movements (2014, background): “Other scholars see group-based anger and group efficacy as two distinct pathways to collective action (van Zomeren et al., 2004).”