The Next Generation of Collective Action Research

By Stephen C. Wright. 2009

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1007edd2f26c819c82e0fe43734f49d1fe820519

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? (2011, background): “In the psychological literature, collective action is typically defined as any action enacted as a representative of the group, aimed at improving the group’s conditions (Wright, Taylor, & Moghaddam, 1990; for discussions, see Van Zomeren & Iyer, 2009; Wright, 2009).”
Introduction to the Social and Psychological Dynamics of Collective Action (2009, background): “Wright’s (2009) final article offers an integrative commentary on the entire issue, as well as an agenda for future research based on points of convergence and divergence.”
Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs (2012, background): “’s (2008) broad focus on collective action across a variety of social contexts (including peace activism, organizational conflict and industrial action, affirmative action amongst women, and the German gay movement, to name a few) and increasingly broad conceptualizations of collective action (Wrigh”
Four Core Social‐Psychological Motivations to Undertake Collective Action (2013, background): “definition (to improve their or another group’s condition) further accommodates that advantaged group members can undertake collective action on behalf of the disadvantaged (van Zomeren & Iyer, 2009; Wright, 2009).”
The biographical consequences of protest and activism: a systematic review and a new typology (2017, background): “Introduction Most research on protest and activist participation has aimed to explain motives to engage in activism or predictors of activism (e.g. Becker, Tausch, & Wagner, 2011; Giugni, 1998, 2008; Klandermans, 1997; Louis, 2009; Simon et al., 1998; Thomas, Mavor, & McGarty, 2012; van Zomeren & Iy”
A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers (2015, background): “However, there is relatively little research on how protest affects individuals and how experiences at a demonstration feed back into activists’ motivation to participate in future collective action (e.g., Louis, 2009; Wright, 2009; but see Drury & Reicher, 2000; 2005).”
Community identity as resource and context: A mixed method investigation of coping and collective action in a disadvantaged community (2013, background): “This is partly due to the complex network of personal, motivational, social structural, experiential and group level factors leading to collective action and partly due to the variability in real world groups and forms of collective action (Wright, 2009).”