Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

By D. Mackie, T. Devos, Eliot R. Smith. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000

1,654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b04b64178d9a7151cdf2ba629696eb496c63c2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Arabs as Terrorists: Effects of Stereotypes Within Violent Contexts on Attitudes, Perceptions, and Affect (2013, background): “This is important given the strong influence of affect in prejudice and discriminatory behaviors such as intergroup aggression (e.g., Brewer, 2001; Mackie et al., 2000; Mummendey & Otten, 2004).”
Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance (2009, background): “(Mackie et al. 2000, Tajfel and Turner 1986, Webber and Donahue 2001).”
The Impact of Intergroup Emotions on Forgiveness in Northern Ireland (2007, background): “Mackie, Devos, and Smith (2000) have shown that although anger and fear are both forms of negative affect, they are empirically distinct and provoke different intergroup behaviors: fear predicts avoidant action tendencies, while anger predicts aggressive action tendencies against the outgroup (Devo”
Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices (2003, background): “Recent research has begun to probe more deeply into the psychological processes underlying the distinct affective responses associated with different prejudices (e.g., Mackie, Devos, & Smith, 2000 ), and these lines of inquiry are nicely complemented by an evolutionary approach to prejudice.”
The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. (2007, methodology): “, Frijda, Kuipers, & ter Schure, 1989) and intergroup emotions (Mackie et al., 2000).”
Anger, Fear, or Sadness: Faculty Members' Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage (2008, background): “Whereas interpersonal anger should motivate interpersonal attacks, groupbased anger should motivate collective protest and challenges to the outgroup (Leach et al., 2007; Mackie et al., 2000; van Zomeren, Spears, Fischer, & Leach, 2004).”
Theorizing States’ Emotions (2011, background): “Still other research has found that levels of identification tend to be higher when groups are engaged in conflict with each other (Mackie et al. 2000).”
The Distinctive Effects of Empathy and Hope in Intractable Conflicts (2017, background): “Highly relevant to the current discussion is the concept of group-based emotions, which refers to emotions that are felt by individuals as a result of their membership in a certain group (Mackie, Devos, and Smith 2000).”
#MeToo as Connective Action: A Study of the Anti-Sexual Violence and Anti-Sexual Harassment Campaign on Chinese Social Media in 2018 (2020, background): “In both theoretical and empirical studies, scholars have identified anger as an “action-oriented emotion” (Mackie, Devos, and Smith 2000; Montada and Schneider 1989) – a key predictor of individuals’ participation and support for collective action (Van Zomeren et al. 2004).”
Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways Toward Terrorism (2008, background): “These feelings are the expression of group identification: caring about what happens to the group, especially in relations with other groups.(10) Group identification can even lead to feelings of guilt about wrongdoing perpetrated by others, if the others are members of the group identified with.”
Beat them or ban them: the characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. (2007, background): “Moreover, in comparing the effects of anger and contempt, Mackie et al. (2000) found that only anger, and not contempt, was a significant predictor of moving against the outgroup.”
Anger and Prosocial Behavior (2014, background): “Mackie, Devos, and Smith (2000) found that participants who perceived the ingroup as strong were more likely to experience anger toward the outgroup and to desire to move against or harm the outgroup.”