A. Poulos

2008

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom A. Poulos trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Carless
  2. E. Mory
  3. Berry M. O’Donovan

Who trusts A. Poulos overall

  1. Tracii Ryan
  2. Michael Henderson
  3. Paul Orsmond
  4. David J. Nicol
  5. A. Jonsson
  6. Gwyneth Hughes
  7. N. Winstone
  8. Emma Mulliner
  9. Edd Pitt
  10. Siv M. Gamlem

Papers from A. Poulos's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers A. Poulos trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Differing perceptions in the feedback process
  2. The Student Experience of Criterion-Referenced Assessment (Through the Introduction of a Common Criteria Assessment Grid)
  3. Feedback research revisited.
  4. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  5. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education
  6. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses
  7. A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice
  8. Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect?
  9. The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  10. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice

Their papers