Stephen D. Walter

Statistics and Probability · 2001–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 17 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Stephen D. Walter trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Richard L. Tweedie

Who trusts Stephen D. Walter overall

  1. Daniele Fanelli
  2. John P. A. Ioannidis
  3. J. Sterne
  4. Lifeng Lin
  5. Linyu Shi
  6. Terri D. Pigott
  7. Andy Field
  8. J. Peters
  9. Mercedes Castro-Nuño
  10. Matthias Egger

Papers from Stephen D. Walter's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stephen D. Walter trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
  2. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.
  3. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. (Mayo Clinic proceedings)
  4. On the psychology of prediction
  5. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  6. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa… (The Lancet)
  7. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables (British medical journal)
  8. Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life: The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation (Medical Care)
  9. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. (Journal of Pain)
  10. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)

Their papers