N. Terrin

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom N. Terrin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. J. Sterne
  2. M. McCullough
  3. Richard L. Tweedie
  4. Matthias Egger
  5. R. Rosenthal

Who trusts N. Terrin overall

  1. John P. A. Ioannidis
  2. Daniele Fanelli
  3. J. Peters
  4. G. Banks
  5. Sven Kepes
  6. Linyu Shi
  7. D. A. Cook
  8. Lifeng Lin
  9. Thomas A. Trikalinos
  10. Weijie Mao

Papers from N. Terrin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers N. Terrin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  2. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
  4. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
  5. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  6. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  7. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
  8. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
  9. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  10. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers