Petra Macaskill
Statistics and Probability · 2001–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 25 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 118 citations into it; #2,475 of 12,932 by trust here, #445 by citations
- Artificial Intelligence — 15 citations into it
Whom Petra Macaskill trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Petra Macaskill overall
- Daniele Fanelli
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- J. Sterne
- Linyu Shi
- Lifeng Lin
- Terri D. Pigott
- Andy Field
- J. Peters
- Mercedes Castro-Nuño
- Matthias Egger
Papers from Petra Macaskill's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Petra Macaskill trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
- Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
- Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
- The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
- Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. (New England Journal of Medicine)
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
- The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (British medical journal)
Their papers
- The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. (2005) — 2,733 citations
- A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001) — 1,216 citations
- Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015) — 4,311 citations
- Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011) — 6,663 citations
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020) — 638 citations
- Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics (2019) — 1,657 citations
- Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. (2013) — 844 citations
- Serum levels of phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and calcium and risks of death and cardiovascular disease in individuals with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2011) — 717 citations
- Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta‐analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting (2008) — 861 citations
- Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. (2008) — 806 citations