Vincent Larivière

Statistics and Probability · 2006–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 72 citations into it; #5,872 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,403 by citations
• Information Systems and Management — 31 citations into it; #3,313 of 3,842 by trust here, #1,043 by citations
• History and Philosophy of Science — 7 citations into it
• Health — 5 citations into it; #1,887 of 2,035 by trust here, #844 by citations

Whom Vincent Larivière trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Dag W. Aksnes
2. Wolfgang Glänzel
3. Mark McCabe
4. Grit Laudel
5. Gunther Eysenbach
6. Lutz Bornmann
7. Rodrigo Costas
8. Éric Archambault
9. Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Who trusts Vincent Larivière overall

1. Ludo Waltman
2. Will E. Hipson
3. Saif M. Mohammad
4. Philippe Mongeon
5. S. Haustein
6. Rodrigo Costas
7. Adèle Paul-Hus
8. Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Papers from Vincent Larivière's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Vincent Larivière trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding (North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics)
2. Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
3. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (Nature)
4. Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web (First Monday)
5. Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
6. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
7. The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine
8. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (J. Documentation)
9. The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web
10. The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update

Their papers

• Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program) (2020) — 607 citations
• Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010) — 564 citations
• Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006) — 493 citations
• Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013) — 949 citations
• Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature (2013) — 456 citations
• Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013) — 1,294 citations
• Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009) — 794 citations
• Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014) — 475 citations
• Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review (2018) — 97 citations
• The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018) — 1,111 citations
• Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2016) — 558 citations
• Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns (2015) — 364 citations
• The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015) — 968 citations