Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science
By Vincent Larivière, Chaoqun Ni, Yves Gingras, Blaise Cronin, Cassidy R. Sugimoto. Nature, 2013
1,294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/785aa3cec7a388b529f52973c818561637b5d964
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Molly M. King
- Victoria L. Brescoll
- Saif M. Mohammad
- Devi M Stuart-Fox
- Cindy E. Hauser
- L. Holman
- C. Moss‐Racusin
- Claudia Wagner
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In Statistics and Probability
- Molly M. King
- Will E. Hipson
- Saif M. Mohammad
- Vincent Larivière
- Jevin D. West
- Devi M Stuart-Fox
- C. Moss‐Racusin
- Claudia Wagner
Citations in the corpus
- PoKi: A Large Dataset of Poems by Children (2020, methodology): “16 Similar approaches were used in the past by others to infer gender (Mohammad, 2020; Larivière et al., 2013; Vanetta, 2016; Knowles et al., 2016).”
- Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time (2016, background): “In the Web of Science, women in first- or sole-author positions receive fewer citations than men in the same positions (Larivière et al. 2013).”
- The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? (2018, background): “For example, computational studies have so far mapped differences in gender ratio across research disciplines [5,6], compared geographic regions [6,7], revealed biases in citation rate [7–9], and shown that women tend to do a greater share of experimental work [10].”
- The pandemic and the academic mothers: present hardships and future perspectives (2020, background): “Furthermore, overall, women publish less than their male colleagues (She Figures 2018), and are cited less than men (Larivière et al. 2013).”
- Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal (2016, background): “Researchers have identified a wide variety of factors that contribute to gender disparity in the sciences and in scientific publishing (Larivi ere et al. 2013; Ceci et al. 2014).”
- Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012, background): “Specifically, many scientists have systemically documented and reported (including in PNAS) a gender bias against women—or favoring men—in STEM contexts (10–17), including hiring decisions for a laboratory-manager position (10) and selection for a mathematical task (11), evaluations of conference ab”
- Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review (2018, methodology): “Globally, women account 16 for about 30 percent of scientific authorship [5] and are underrepresented in the scientific 17 workforce [6, 7].”
- It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia (2015, background): “In (Sugimoto et al. 2013) the authors present a cross-disciplinary, global, bibliometric analysis of the relation between gender and scientific output (i.”
- Gender Gap in Natural Language Processing Research: Disparities in Authorship and Citations (2020, background): “Other studies have identified substantial gender gaps in science (Håkanson, 2005; Larivière et al., 2013; King et al., 2017; Andersen and Nielsen, 2018).”