Cassidy R. Sugimoto
Statistics and Probability · 2012–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 56 citations into it; #7,001 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,962 by citations
- Information Systems — 23 citations into it
- Information Systems and Management — 21 citations into it; #1,801 of 3,842 by trust here, #1,703 by citations
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics — 17 citations into it; #9,290 of 10,127 by trust here, #8,120 by citations
- Health — 6 citations into it; #1,884 of 2,035 by trust here, #844 by citations
Whom Cassidy R. Sugimoto trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Gunther Eysenbach
- Lutz Bornmann
- Wolfgang Glänzel
- Rodrigo Costas
- Xin Shuai
- Zohreh Zahedi
- Thorsten Gruber
- George Veletsianos
- Dan Gillmor
- Vincent Larivière
Who trusts Cassidy R. Sugimoto overall
Papers from Cassidy R. Sugimoto's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Cassidy R. Sugimoto trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (Journal of Medical Internet Research)
- Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web (First Monday)
- What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- The scientific impact of nations (Nature)
- Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter
- Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (Scientometrics)
- Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry (Scientometrics)
Their papers
- Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013) — 949 citations
- Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature (2013) — 456 citations
- Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013) — 1,294 citations
- Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review (2015) — 294 citations
- Bias in peer review (2013) — 990 citations
- Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014) — 475 citations
- Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries (2012) — 418 citations
- Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review (2018) — 97 citations
- Big data is not a monolith (2016) — 27 citations
- Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2016) — 558 citations