Wolfgang Glänzel

Economics and Econometrics · 2002–2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 30 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 67 citations into it; #8,427 of 23,481 by trust here, #8,485 by citations
• Management of Technology and Innovation — 47 citations into it; #1,339 of 3,602 by trust here, #1,923 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 28 citations into it; #1,505 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,662 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 13 citations into it
• Strategy and Management — 13 citations into it
• Statistical and Nonlinear Physics — 11 citations into it; #1,381 of 10,127 by trust here, #4,439 by citations
• Information Systems and Management — 6 citations into it
• Molecular Biology — 5 citations into it

Whom Wolfgang Glänzel trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. J. Sylvan Katz
2. Marno Verbeek
3. Martin S. Meyer
4. Stefano Breschi
5. Henry Etzkowitz
6. Suzanne Scotchmer
7. Adam B. Jaffe
8. Philip Ball
9. Jerry G. Thursby
10. Mark Newman

Who trusts Wolfgang Glänzel overall

1. Leo Egghe
2. Ludo Waltman
3. Judit Bar-Ilan
4. Henk F. Moed
5. Caroline S. Wagner
6. Loet Leydesdorff
7. R. Rousseau
8. A. Abbasi
9. Mu-Hsuan Huang
10. Manuel Jesus Cobo

Papers from Wolfgang Glänzel's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Wolfgang Glänzel trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT (Management Sciences)
2. WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS
3. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy
4. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
5. THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY OF ACADEMIC INVENTORS: NEW EVIDENCE FROM ITALIAN DATA
6. Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology
7. Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View
8. Toward a basic framework for webometrics (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
9. Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation
10. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND EUROPEAN INNOVATION SYSTEMS

Their papers

• Heterogeneity of Patenting Activity and Its Implications for Scientific Research (2007) — 152 citations
• Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity (2007) — 128 citations
• National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (2004) — 753 citations
• Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2004) — 561 citations
• Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies (2004) — 521 citations
• Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry (2004) — 302 citations
• A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes (2004) — 361 citations
• On the Opportunities and Limitations of the H-index (2006) — 203 citations
• Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005) — 649 citations
• A Hirsch-type index for journals [1] (2005) — 158 citations
• Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (2004) — 418 citations
• Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies (2002) — 325 citations