The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An Update

By Stevan Harnad, Tim Brody, F. Valliéres, L. Carr, S. Hitchcock, Yves Gingras, C. Oppenheim, Chawki Hajjem, E. Hilf. 2008

622 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2015, background): “There are green and gold roads to OA (Harnad et al., 2004, 2008).”
Evidence for the network perspective on organizational learning (2008, background): “2005; Harnad & Brody, 2004; Harnad et al. 2004 ) have carried out large-scale trials”
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018, background): “These ‘‘OA archives’’ are either disciplinary repositories like ArXiv, or ‘‘institutional repositories (IRs) operated by universities, and the archived articles may be either the published versions, or electronic preprints (Harnad et al., 2008).”
The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010, background): “Harnad et al. (2004) stated with reference to Ulrich that about 24,000 peer-reviewed research journals existed worldwide.”
Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact (2005, methodology): “We have since replicated this OA citation advantage based on a single large central OA archive in physics [10, 11 ] and have begun testing it more widely [7].”
Designing for Learning in an Open World (2012, background): “This raises the issue of what will be the impact of the open access movement (Harnard et al. 2004 ) for learning, teaching and research?”