Dag W. Aksnes

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 27 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Dag W. Aksnes trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Ludo Waltman
  2. Anthony F. J. van Raan
  3. Charles Auffray
  4. Lutz Bornmann
  5. Eugene Garfield
  6. Philippe Mongeon
  7. Peter Weingart
  8. John P. A. Ioannidis
  9. Daniele Fanelli
  10. L. Langfeldt

Who trusts Dag W. Aksnes overall

  1. Judit Bar-Ilan
  2. Raminta Pranckute
  3. Peter van den Besselaar
  4. Ludo Waltman
  5. Loet Leydesdorff
  6. Chaomei Chen
  7. Lutz Bornmann
  8. Jian Wang
  9. Zhigao Liu
  10. Vincent Larivière

Papers from Dag W. Aksnes's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Dag W. Aksnes trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (J. Documentation)
  2. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  3. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (J. Informetrics)
  4. Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university
  5. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (J. Informetrics)
  6. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (Scientometrics)
  7. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS
  8. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (PLoS ONE)
  9. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
  10. The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management

Their papers