Adèle Paul-Hus

Statistics and Probability · 2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Adèle Paul-Hus trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Éric Archambault
  2. Vincent Larivière

Who trusts Adèle Paul-Hus overall

  1. Raminta Pranckute
  2. Philip Hallinger
  3. Seperia B. Wanyama
  4. E. Giménez
  5. Dag W. Aksnes
  6. Suparak Suriyankietkaew

Papers from Adèle Paul-Hus's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Adèle Paul-Hus trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study (Online information review (Print))
  2. Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (Scientometrics)
  3. Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
  4. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (Scientometrics)
  5. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
  6. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (Scientometrics)
  7. The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (PLoS ONE)
  8. As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases
  9. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (Biomedical Digital Libraries)
  10. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (Scientometrics)

Their papers