National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations

By Wolfgang Glänzel. Scientometrics, 2004

753 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67f38aef6351d9126177101dc1e625c1df7eeb0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2011, background): “…& La Barre, 2003; Giles & Councill, 2004), organizational factors (Glanzel & Schubert, 2004), geographical factors (Ding, Foo & Chowdhury, 1998; Glanzel, 2001), social stratification factors (Kretschmer, 1994), sector factors (Leydesdorff & Etzkowitz, 1996), and academic credit factors (Katz &…”
Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research (2019, neutral): “…Courtial, Turner, and Bauin (1983) Study the conceptual structure of a research field using the most important words or keywords Co-author analysis Glänzel (2001); Peters and van Raan (1991) Analyse authors and their affiliations to study the social structure and collaboration network…”
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review (2008, methodology): “The initial study by van Leeuwen et al. was extended to study the medical output of Germany, France, Switzerland, Italy, Spain and Japan when analyzing all ISI indexed publications versus analysis of only English language publications indexed by ISI (van Leeuwen, Moed, Tijssen, Visser, & van Raan, 2”
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011, background): “Co-author analyzes the authors and their affiliations to study the social structure and collaboration networks (Gänzel, 2001; Peters & van Raan, 1991).”
How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures (2009, neutral): “The objects can be, for example , authors (e.g., White and McCain, 1998), countries (e.g., Glänzel, 2001; Zitt et al., 2000), documents (e.g., Gmür, 2003; Klavans and Boyack, 2006b), journals (e.g., Boyack, Klavans, and Börner, 2005; Klavans and Boyack, 2006a), Web pages (e.g., Vaughan, 2006;…”
Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries (2012, background): “One noted nuance is the prevailing impact of culture, tradition, politics and language in determining collaborators (Glanzel & Schubert, 2001; Zitt, Bassecoulard, & Okubo, 2000; Schubert & Glanzel, 2006), in addition to the physical proximity issue noted for institutional collaborations.”
Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014, background): “There is compelling evidence that the geographic proximity between the first and last authors generates higher citations (Lee, Brownstein, Mills, & Kohane, 2010) and that international collaborations, in general, generate higher citations (Glänzel, 2001).”
International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group (2008, background): “During the 1990s, a rapid rise occurred in internationally co-authored papers indicating a rise in collaboration (Doré, Ojasoo, & Okubo, 1996; Georghiou, 1998; Glänzel, 2001).”
Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. (2005, methodology): “(Narin 1991; Luukkonen et al. 1992 and 1993; Miquel & Okubo 1994; Doré et al. 1996; Georghiou 1998; Glänzel 2001).”
SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool (2012, methodology): “For example, using the authors, a coauthor or coauthorship analysis can be performed to study the social structure of a scientific field (Gänzel, 2001; Peters & van Raan, 1991).”
Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties (2013, background): “Two studies (Glänzel, 2001; Glänzel & Schubert, 2001) avoid this issue by taking the full Science Citation Index (SCI) during a one or two-year period.”