Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research

By Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch. 2005

649 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cef34375cbcd7b56c3fb42ce9df504efe021deee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Loet Leydesdorff
2. Liaquat Hossain
3. Natarajan Balasubramanian
4. A. Abbasi
5. Jagadeesh Sivadasan
6. Ismael Rafols
7. Chaomei Chen
8. Ludo Waltman

Citations in the corpus

• Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks (2011, methodology): “The most commonly used methods for studying collaboration networks have been: bibliometrics (Bordons & Gómez, 2000; Glänzel, 2002; Glänzel & Schubert, 2004); social network analysis/network science (Barabási et al., 2002; Kretschmer, 1997; Newman, 2001c, 2004a; Wagner, 2008; Wagner & Leydesdorff,…”
• What Happens When Firms Patent? New Evidence from U.S. Economic Census Data (2009, methodology): “For researchers interested in the R&D data, Kerr and Fu (2006) provide a concordance between census data and the NSF R&D Survey.”