Judit Bar-Ilan

Statistics and Probability · 2005–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 45 researchers and is trusted by 21 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 79 citations into it; #1,733 of 12,932 by trust here, #2,800 by citations
• Information Systems — 30 citations into it; #705 of 8,771 by trust here, #2,064 by citations
• Statistical and Nonlinear Physics — 30 citations into it; #1,771 of 10,127 by trust here, #5,403 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 17 citations into it
• Management of Technology and Innovation — 14 citations into it
• Strategy and Management — 13 citations into it; #2,322 of 10,874 by trust here, #5,919 by citations
• Information Systems and Management — 12 citations into it
• Artificial Intelligence — 10 citations into it

Whom Judit Bar-Ilan trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Mark Newman
2. R. Rousseau
3. Leo Egghe
4. Wolfgang Glänzel
5. Jorge E. Hirsch
6. Markus Gmür
7. Michelle Girvan
8. Dag W. Aksnes
9. Blaise Cronin
10. Lutz Bornmann

Who trusts Judit Bar-Ilan overall

1. Ludo Waltman
2. John C. Mingers
3. Peder Olesen Larsen
4. Elizabeth S. Vieira
5. Michael Gusenbauer
6. Chaomei Chen
7. José M. Merigó
8. Loet Leydesdorff
9. Markus von Ins
10. José A. N. F. Gomes

Papers from Judit Bar-Ilan's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Judit Bar-Ilan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The structure of scientific collaboration networks.
2. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. (Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics)
3. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
4. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA)
5. Community structure in social and biological networks (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
6. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (Nature)
7. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS
8. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (Scientometrics)
9. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (Scientometrics)
10. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks

Their papers

• Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review (2008) — 459 citations
• Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2008) — 765 citations
• Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation - Review of the Literature (2017) — 435 citations
• Comparing university rankings (2010) — 335 citations
• Preference for electronic format of scientific journals—A case study of the Science Library users at the Hebrew University (2005) — 86 citations