Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry

By Wolfgang Glänzel, A. Schubert. Scientometrics, 2004

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties (2013, background): “Two studies (Glänzel, 2001; Glänzel & Schubert, 2001) avoid this issue by taking the full Science Citation Index (SCI) during a one or two-year period.”
National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (2004, methodology): “A possible way to characterise the relative ‘importance’ of other countries for selected countries according to a method introduced by Glänzel (2000) and Glänzel and Schubert (2001) is presented in Table 2.”
Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries (2012, background): “One noted nuance is the prevailing impact of culture, tradition, politics and language in determining collaborators (Glanzel & Schubert, 2001; Zitt, Bassecoulard, & Okubo, 2000; Schubert & Glanzel, 2006), in addition to the physical proximity issue noted for institutional collaborations.”