R. Subramaniam

Developmental and Educational Psychology · with Caleon · 2008–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom R. Subramaniam trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Douglas G. Altman
  2. Mary A. Lundeberg
  3. Haim Eshach

Who trusts R. Subramaniam overall

  1. Derya Kaltakci Gurel
  2. Der‐Ching Yang

Papers from R. Subramaniam's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers R. Subramaniam trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Practical statistics for medical research
  2. Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions
  3. Sound Stuff? Naïve materialism in middle‐school students’ conceptions of sound
  4. Cultural influences on confidence : Country and gender
  5. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  6. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  7. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  8. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  9. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
  10. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers