Regina Kunz
Statistics and Probability · 2003–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 22 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 60 citations into it; #5,824 of 12,932 by trust here, #85 by citations
Whom Regina Kunz trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Regina Kunz overall
- G. Guyatt
- M. Samuel
- Michiel Frederick Coetzer
- Adriani Nikolakopoulou
- Holger J. Schünemann
- Miles Richardson
- J. Brożek
Papers from Regina Kunz's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Regina Kunz trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
- Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. (New England Journal of Medicine)
- Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- The safety of statins in clinical practice. (The Lancet)
- When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise (British medical journal)
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review (British medical journal)
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
- Increased Cancer-Related Mortality for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Use Sulfonylureas or Insulin (Diabetes Care)
Their papers
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (2011) — 9,069 citations
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (2008) — 15,278 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. (2011) — 1,712 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. (2011) — 1,582 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. (2011) — 1,166 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. (2011) — 1,457 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias). (2011) — 2,570 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. (2013) — 683 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. (2013) — 694 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. (2011) — 7,351 citations
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? (2008) — 2,968 citations
- Stopping randomized trials early for benefit and estimation of treatment effects: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. (2010) — 602 citations
- GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. (2011) — 2,352 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. (2013) — 1,344 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. (2013) — 641 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. (2011) — 1,187 citations
- Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2018) — 611 citations
- GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. (2018) — 718 citations
- Effects of interventions in pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes: meta-analysis of randomised evidence (2012) — 872 citations
- Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2012) — 1,609 citations