GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.

By J. Andrews, G. Guyatt, Andrew D. Oxman, P. Alderson, P. Dahm, Y. Falck-Ytter, M. Nasser, J. Meerpohl, Piet N. Post, Regina Kunz and 5 more. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013

1,344 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (2021, positive): “org/Pract ice- Quali ty/Clini cal- Suppo rt/Clini cal- Pract iceGuide lines) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence and develop recommendations (5,6).”
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer (2015, neutral): “Table 3 Strength of recommendation [24]”
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015, background): “In the EBM era and with the surging number of publications, the major attention is “Going from evidence to recommendations” (81, 82).”
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). (2014, methodology): “A final consensus statement on BRPC was formulated and agreed by all cosignatories, following theGrading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (ie, GRADE) guidelines.(6)”
ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss (2018, neutral): “*Andrews et al. (2013).”