GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes.

By G. Guyatt, K. Thorlund, Andrew D. Oxman, Stephen D. Walter, D.walaa badawy, T. Furukawa, B. Johnston, P. Karanicolas, Elie A. Akl, G. Vist and 8 more. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013

641 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/172df17ab8ad6a6dd71c3343bd6597bc54b38d9e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Jakobsen
2. J. Wetterslev
3. C. Gluud

In General Health Professions

1. J. Wetterslev
2. C. Gluud

In Statistics and Probability

1. J. Jakobsen
2. J. Wetterslev
3. C. Gluud
4. P. Winkel
5. T. Lange

Citations in the corpus

• Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014, methodology): “The GRADE system provides a valid assessment of the quality of evidence in systematic reviews [2,16-19].”