GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes.

By G. Guyatt, Andrew D. Oxman, S. Sultan, J. Brożek, P. Glasziou, P. Alonso-Coello, D. Atkins, Regina Kunz, Victor M. Montori, Roman Jaeschke and 9 more. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013

683 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/371551e09aac83fffad53beb3af660bad03528e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Holger J. Schünemann
2. Georgia Salanti
3. G. Guyatt
4. J. Brożek
5. A. Chaimani
6. Julian P. T. Higgins
7. J. Meerpohl
8. Andrew D. Oxman

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Holger J. Schünemann
2. J. Brożek
3. G. Guyatt
4. Andrew D. Oxman
5. C. Gluud
6. Georgia Salanti
7. J. Yepes‐Nuñez
8. J. Meerpohl

In Statistics and Probability

1. A. Chaimani
2. Georgia Salanti
3. Julian P. T. Higgins
4. J. Wetterslev
5. C. Gluud
6. J. Jakobsen
7. C. Del Giovane
8. Holger J. Schünemann

Citations in the corpus

• GRADE guidelines 26: Informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions. (2019, background): “the GRADE approach into high, moderate, low and very low) [1-6].”
• Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014, methodology): “The GRADE system provides a valid assessment of the quality of evidence in systematic reviews [2,16-19].”
• Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014, methodology): “We refer to guidance from the GRADE Working Group for more details about how the final rating of confidence can be derived [31].”
• The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence (2017, background): “This is what GRADE currently refers to as the overall certainty of evidence [7] and thusdpending further conceptual developmentdit provides an interim approximation of certainty in the net benefit.”
• Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. (2020, background): “The potential benefits for mortality and, in particular the moderate quality evidence for improvements in physical functioning, provide support to recommend RT (Guyatt et al. 2013).”
• GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. (2013, methodology): “use [9], rating the confidence in effect estimates across outcomes [10], and creating an evidence profile and a Summary of Findings table [11e13].”
• American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients. (2018, background): “However, the effect estimates all favored LMWH and, thus, the overall certainty was moderate for the critical outcomes.(120)”