Stuart Young

Language and Linguistics · 2005

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 16 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Stuart Young trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Ferris
  2. Jean Chandler

Who trusts Stuart Young overall

  1. N. Storch
  2. J. Bitchener
  3. D. Ferris
  4. John Truscott
  5. Melissa M. Nelson
  6. Kaiyang Guo
  7. Natsuko Shintani
  8. R. Ellis
  9. Younghee Sheen
  10. M. Rahimi

Papers from Stuart Young's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stuart Young trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE?
  2. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing
  3. Teaching ESL composition : purpose, process, and practice
  4. THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING
  5. The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)
  6. The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.
  7. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles.
  8. Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students
  9. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction
  10. EVIDENCE AND CONJECTURE ON THE EFFECTS OF CORRECTION: A RESPONSE TO CHANDLER

Their papers