H. Lotze-Campen

Economics and Econometrics · 2008–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 24 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 169 citations into it
• Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 101 citations into it
• Environmental Engineering — 96 citations into it; #4,719 of 5,479 by trust here, #532 by citations
• General Agricultural and Biological Sciences — 40 citations into it
• Agronomy and Crop Science — 38 citations into it
• Soil Science — 38 citations into it
• Water Science and Technology — 24 citations into it; #1,366 of 1,711 by trust here, #844 by citations
• Ocean Engineering — 15 citations into it; #2,757 of 3,193 by trust here, #434 by citations

Whom H. Lotze-Campen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. A. Popp
2. Christoph Müller
3. David B. Lobell
4. Katherine Calvin
5. H. Meijl
6. C. Schmitz
7. W. Schlenker
8. M. Rosegrant
9. Elmar Kriegler
10. Arjen Y. Hoekstra

Who trusts H. Lotze-Campen overall

1. A. Popp
2. Florian Humpenöder
3. Elmar Kriegler
4. Gunnar Luderer
5. C. Schmitz
6. C. Castiblanco
7. J. Dietrich
8. Nico Bauer
9. Benjamin Leon Bodirsky
10. Katherine Calvin

Papers from H. Lotze-Campen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers H. Lotze-Campen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 (Climate Dynamics)
2. The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
3. Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations (Science)
4. The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe
5. Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison
6. Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system
7. Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990–2080 (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)
8. 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C
9. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
10. Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios

Their papers

• The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview (2017) — 5,435 citations
• Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies (2014) — 185 citations
• Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century (2017) — 624 citations
• The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE (2014) — 111 citations
• Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model (2014) — 133 citations
• Trading more food: Implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions, and the food system (2012) — 197 citations
• Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison (2014) — 126 citations
• Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks (2013) — 811 citations
• Agriculture and climate change in global scenarios: why don't the models agree (2014) — 288 citations
• Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison (2014) — 291 citations
• The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system (2011) — 207 citations
• Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options (2014) — 187 citations
• Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy (2020) — 757 citations
• The impact of climate change on incomes and convergence in Africa (2020) — 153 citations
• Peatland protection and restoration are key for climate change mitigation (2020) — 159 citations
• Comparing impacts of climate change and mitigation on global agriculture by 2050 (2018) — 136 citations
• Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? (2018) — 158 citations
• Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy (2018) — 451 citations
• Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways (2017) — 939 citations
• Climate change impacts on agriculture in 2050 under a range of plausible socioeconomic and emissions scenarios (2015) — 293 citations