Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

By A. Popp, S. Rose, Katherine Calvin, D. P. Vuuren, J. Dietrich, Marshall Wise, Elke Stehfest, Florian Humpenöder, Page Kyle, J. Vliet and 4 more. Climatic Change, 2014

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61afb80afd3d7dbbc297c9dee2bf1593e8d562ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. H. Lotze-Campen
2. Pete Smith
3. Elmar Kriegler
4. A. Popp
5. Elke Stehfest
6. John P. Weyant

In Biomedical Engineering

1. John P. Weyant

In Pollution

1. Keywan Riahi
2. Andrzej Tabeau
3. D. P. Vuuren

Citations in the corpus

• Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century (2017, unknown): “Emissions in the land-use and energy sectors are interlinked by overarching climate policy objectives and the deployment of bioenergy (Klein et al., 2014b; Popp et al., 2014a; Rose et al., 2014).”
• Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management (2014, background): “…trade-off varies across models, e.g., reduced forest carbon mitigation (afforestation and avoided deforestation), displaced natural growth, or reduced N2O mitigation (see Popp et al. 2013, for a focused discussion of the land-use implications of bioenergy for three of the models).”