Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model Intercomparison

By M. V. Lampe, D. Willenbockel, Helal Ahammad, É. Blanc, Yongxia Cai, Katherine Calvin, Shinichiro Fujimori, T. Hasegawa, Petr Havlík, E. Heyhoe and 10 more. 2014

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/746793533df0693c87dee29cf8240bbe4f3d92e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Christoph Müller
2. Elke Stehfest
3. Petr Havlík
4. Hugo Valin

In Economics and Econometrics

1. H. Meijl
2. Andrzej Tabeau
3. Page Kyle
4. Katherine Calvin
5. D. Mensbrugghe
6. H. Lotze-Campen
7. J. Reilly
8. A. Popp

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Sherman Robinson
2. L. Savard

Citations in the corpus

• Climate change impacts on agriculture in 2050 under a range of plausible socioeconomic and emissions scenarios (2015, methodology): “The explicit goal of that intercomparison of global economicmodels was ‘to understand the differences inmodel projections andmodel behavior and to identify their sources; not to choose scenarios for their plausibility’ (von Lampe et al 2014).”
• The expansion of modern agriculture and global biodiversity decline: An integrated assessment (2016, unknown): “1 Together these imply an expansion of the modern agricultural system in order to meet growing dietary needs and food preferences (Alexandratos and Bruinsma, 2012; Lampe et al., 2014; Lanz et al., 2017a).”
• Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling (2014, background): “Sowing dates have 218 been computed as in Waha et al. (2012), but have been kept constant after 1951.”
• A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation (2019, unknown): “47 48 Acknowledgement; 49 SFu, TH, and KT are supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K18177, JSPS 50 Overseas Research Fellowships, and the Environment Research and Technology 51 Development Fund (2-1702) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of 52 Japan.”
• The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview (2017, unknown): “Notable exceptions include (Nelson et al., 2014; Popp et al., 2014; Schmitz et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2010; Von Lampe et al., 2014).”