The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers (2018, background): “A few studies have explored the possible economic consequences of large-scale BECCS deployment [48,12].”
Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action (2014, background): “be managed as part of CSA (for example, see [172,173]).”
Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century (2017, unknown): “Emissions in the land-use and energy sectors are interlinked by overarching climate policy objectives and the deployment of bioenergy (Klein et al., 2014b; Popp et al., 2014a; Rose et al., 2014).”
Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “High indoor concentrations of CO2, as prevalent in bed rooms, and classrooms, have negative effects on performance, health, and human health (Kotol et al 2014).”
The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: energy transition and the role of direct air capture (2017, background): “The role of BECCS in the future energy system (Kriegler et al. 2013a; Fuss et al. 2014; van Vuuren et al. 2013; Popp et al. 2011; Klein et al. 2014) and that of afforestation (Canadell and Raupach 2008; IPCC 2007; Obersteiner et al.”