The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)

By Christian Azar, Kristian Lindgren, Michael Obersteiner, Keywan Riahi, D. P. Vuuren, K. M. G. D. Elzen, K. Möllersten, E. Larson. 2010

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58c2f9b0c14d089397ad2a94adaf98ecb64b5896

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Gunnar Luderer
2. Pete Smith
3. Felix Creutzig
4. Elmar Kriegler
5. Ottmar Edenhofer
6. D. V. van Vuuren
7. D. P. Vuuren
8. J. Minx

In Environmental Engineering

1. Gunnar Luderer
2. Felix Creutzig
3. Pete Smith
4. Ottmar Edenhofer
5. Elmar Kriegler
6. D. V. van Vuuren
7. Daniel J. A. Johansson
8. D. P. Vuuren

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Gunnar Luderer
2. Felix Creutzig
3. Ottmar Edenhofer
4. Pete Smith
5. Elmar Kriegler
6. D. P. Vuuren
7. Daniel J. A. Johansson
8. D. V. van Vuuren

Citations in the corpus

• Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, background): “Modeling studies also make the point that scaling up to meaningful levels could take ‘decades’ (Azar et al 2013) or even ‘half a century’ (Azar et al 2010).”
• The Emissions Gap Report 2012 (2012, background): “For example, recent studies (OECD, 2012; van Vliet et al., 2012) have found that emission levels in 2020 resulting from an optimistic compliance with country pledges26 (which according to the least cost analysis in this report would cause an emissions gap) would have a “likely” chance of staying wit”
• Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options (2014, background): “Recently, bioenergy has received evenmore attention in combination with carbon dioxide capture and geologic storage (BECCS), which can lead to a net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere (Rose et al. 2013; Azar et al. 2010).”
• The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling (2013, background): “There is more consensus on the impact of land-use change in snow-covered areas in the temperate zone, where large scale reforestation measures could lead to a net warming impact (Betts 2000; Schaeffer et al. 2006).”
• The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE (2014, background): “This feature1 of bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) alleviates the deep reductions of GHG emissions that are necessary to meet stringent climate change mitigation targets (van Vuuren et al. 2010a, b; Azar et al. 2010; Kriegler et al. 2013a; Edenhofer et al. 2010).”
• Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management (2014, background): “H ow ev er , th er e is a na tu ra l re so ur ce in pu t to bi oe le ct ri ci ty pr od uc tio n th at is re pr es en ta tiv e of bi om as s (e.g., Azar et al. 2010; Lemoine et al. 2012).”
• Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “…gross CO2 emissions can be larger than the carbon budget as long as they are simultaneously compensated by negative emissions (figure 1) (Kriegler et al 2014, Riahi et al 2015, Eom et al 2015, van Vuuren et al 2013, van Vuuren and Riahi 2011, van Vuuren et al 2007, Azar et al 2006, 2010).”