T. Schaller

Applied Psychology · 2015–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 28 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Applied Psychology — 19 citations into it
• Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 19 citations into it
• Management Science and Operations Research — 12 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 12 citations into it
• Marketing — 11 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 9 citations into it
• Computer Networks and Communications — 5 citations into it
• Management Information Systems — 5 citations into it

Whom T. Schaller trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Philip M. Podsakoff
2. Michael K. Lindell
3. I. Ajzen
4. Paul E. Spector
5. Scott B. MacKenzie
6. C. Lance
7. Lawrence J. Williams
8. Hettie A. Richardson
9. Marcia J. Simmering
10. D. J. Whitney

Papers from T. Schaller's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers T. Schaller trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
2. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
3. Method Variance in Organizational Research
4. Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies
5. What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
6. Theory of Planned Behavior
7. Publishing in AMJ—Part 2: Research Design
8. Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies
9. Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management
10. Cross-Sectional versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines

Their papers

• Common Method Variance in Advertising Research: When to Be Concerned and How to Control for It (2017) — 276 citations
• Alternative Techniques for Assessing Common Method Variance (2015) — 102 citations