A FIELD EXPERIMENT TESTING SUPERVISORY ROLE CLARIFICATION

By J. Schaubroeck, Daniel C. Ganster, W. Sime, D. Ditman. 2006

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffcb042489b92d4992d8265db96bdc4897ac43c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Joel Koopman
2. Christopher C. Rosen
3. Brent A. Scott
4. Daniel C. Ganster
5. Donald E. Conlon
6. Fadel K. Matta
7. R. Ilies

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Fadel K. Matta
2. Christopher C. Rosen
3. Joel Koopman
4. Brent A. Scott
5. Daniel C. Ganster
6. Donald E. Conlon
7. J. Colquitt
8. T. Judge

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joel Koopman
2. Fadel K. Matta
3. Christopher C. Rosen
4. Brent A. Scott
5. Daniel C. Ganster
6. Donald E. Conlon
7. J. Colquitt
8. Sabine Sonnentag

Citations in the corpus

• Work Stress and Employee Health (2013, background): “…first, the randomized field experiments that we located reported findings pertaining to a particular intervention (e.g., logan & Ganster, 2005; Schaubroeck et al., 1993), suggesting that intervention studies show either (a) the theory underlying these interventions is inadequate or (b) some…”
• Does Seeing “Eye To Eye” Affect Work Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behavior? A Role Theory Perspective on LMX Agreement (2014, background): “Although misalignment in roles may persist (Schaubroeck et al., 1993), in situations of LMX quality incongruence, it maybethatsituations inwhichthesupervisorviews the relationshipasofhigh (low)quality,but thesubordinate doesnot, aremore likely tomove towarda shared,high(low-) quality LMX…”