Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation.

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Phonological Skills Are (Probably) One Cause of Success in Learning to Read: A Comment on Castles and Coltheart (2005, background): “So, for example, words with ambiguous spelling patterns such as PINT are responded to more slowly in an auditory lexical decision task than words with regular spelling-sound patterns even though in such experiments the written forms of the words are never presented (Ziegler & Ferrand, 1998; Ziegler”
Automatic activation of orthography in spoken word recognition: Pseudohomograph priming (2008, methodology): “…auditory lexical decision task used by Pattamadilok et al (2007), Ventura et al. (2004), Ziegler and Ferrand (1998), Ziegler and Muneaux (2007), and Ziegler et al. (2003) does not require the listener to consciously reflect upon the phonological characteristics of the target word because the…”
Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task (2004, methodology): “The items were taken from Experiment 1 of the Ziegler et al. (2003) study.”
The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition: Further evidence from French (2007, background): “Second, the influence of orthographic knowledge at the level of sublexical representations was also documented by Ziegler, Muneaux, and Grainger ( 2003 ).”