Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective.

By J. G. Holmes. 2002

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff15a8853bdecb8d93d31f8eb5c93f2132ac0041

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Secure attachment: implications for hope, trust, burnout, and performance (2009, methodology): “Moreover, the Joplin et al. (1999) study demonstrated that the SRI displayed a clean factor structure consistent with the theoretical underpinnings of attachment theory and evidence for construct validity.”
Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: theory and evidence. (2011, result): “This notion is consistent with a variety of theories claiming that individuals rely on existing cognitive structures in coming to understand new information (e.g., Crick & Dodge, 1994; Holmes, 2002; Piaget, 1954).”
Filling the Void (2014, unknown): “Inter-actions in committed relationships refute negative working models of other when a partner conveys their pro-relationship motives (Holmes, 2002; Simpson, 2007; Wieselquist et al., 1999).”
De‐investment in work and non‐normative personality trait change in young adulthood (2006, background): “The assumption is that people will shape their own behaviour in response to the expectations that they hold and that others in their social environment promote (Holmes, 2002).”
Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. (2003, background): “…formulation, noting that an interaction (I) between persons A and B can be conceptualized in terms of their needs, thoughts, and motives in relation to one another (A and B) in the context of the specific social situation (S) in which their interaction transpires (Holmes 2002, Kelley et al. 2002).”
Attachment styles and interpersonal approach and avoidance goals in everyday couple interactions (2008, background): “Therefore, the current study was unable to test whether certain situations tend to trigger certain goals in individuals with certain attachment styles (cf. Holmes, 2002).”
The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others (2007, result): “This notion is in line with previous theorizing on the possible role of automatic processes in the context of close relationships (e.g., Holmes, 2002; Reis, Collins, & Berscheid, 2000).”
Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework (2008, background): “…of agreeableness focuses on this factor's role in human cooperative behavior, with Buss (1991) relating it to people's willingness to cooperate, Holmes (2002) to acting cooperative vs. competitive, Nettle (2006) to empathy and trust vs. self-interest, and van Lieshout (2000) to the…”
Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies. (2004, background): “…in social psychology that indicates that many aspects of social perception are guided by top-down, theorydriven processes in which people’s existing goals, schemas, and expectations shape the way they view new information (Baldwin, 1992; Holmes, 2002; Olson, Roese, & Zanna, 1996; Taylor, 1998).”
Integrating Personality and Social Networks: A Meta-Analysis of Personality, Network Position, and Work Outcomes in Organizations (2015, background): “Agreeable people are motivated to develop positive relations with others (Barrick et al. 2002), show empathy (Nettle 2006), and cooperate (Denissen and Penke 2008, Holmes 2002).”
The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory (2015, background): “For example, social psychologists that focus specifically on interactions identify multiple dimensions of situational interdependence (Holmes, 2002), that in turn create over 20 different prototypes of interactive/interpersonal situations (Kelley, Holmes, Kerr, Reis, Rusbult, & Van Lange, 2003).”
How can we promote behaviour that serves all of us in the future (2008, background): “Clearly, some key relational constructs, such as commitment and trust, are able to predict various propartner behaviors that align with altruism, cooperation, and fairness (see also Holmes, 2002; Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, unknown): “In interactions with familiar others, one could, for instance, assume that trustworthiness expectations are primarily based on prior trust experiences with the specific interaction partner in similar situations—in line with interdependence theory (Holmes, 2002).”
PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships (2011, background): “…they often engage in ‘mind-reading’ and develop metaperceptions about how others might perceive them, how others feel about them, and what others want from them (Back, Schmukle, & Egloff, in press; Gleason, JensenCampbell, & Ickes, 2009; Holmes, 2002; Kenny, 1994; Simpson, Orina, & Ickes, 2003).”
The Concept of Situations (2009, background): “In fact, few researchers have attempted to conceptualize and theorize situations in a systematic manner (for exceptions, see Argyle et al., 1981; Holmes, 2002; Kelley et al., 2003; Reis, 2008).”
Making the good even better: A review and theoretical model of interpersonal capitalization (2018, background): “…is that dyads form a regulatory system in which individuals' goals, pursuits, affect, and outcomes can depend on and spread to their partners (Holmes, 2002; Kelley et al., 2003; see also Butler & Randall, 2012; Fitzsimons et al., 2015; Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994; Reis, Collins, &…”
Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life (2015, background): “…well with the (hyper-) vigilance aspect of Neuroticism (Nettle, 2006) and anxious monitoring of social exclusion (e.g., Denissen & Penke, 2008; Holmes, 2002) where neurotic persons would perceive Adversity (e.g., being blamed, criticized, threatened, etc.) even if they were not in actually…”