Interdependence, interaction, and relationships.

By C. Rusbult, P. V. van Lange. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003

1,098 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b148ea86a3057b8cc6fc5007d770a91ff89ceae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Amy C. Edmondson
2. Adam D. Galinsky
3. P. V. van Lange
4. Daniel Balliet
5. Linda Argote
6. Bogdan Wojciszke
7. Gerben van der Vegt
8. J. Stuart Bunderson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Adam D. Galinsky
3. Linda Argote
4. Bogdan Wojciszke
5. Joe C. Magee
6. Daniel Balliet
7. Gerben van der Vegt
8. J. Joireman

Citations in the corpus

• EXPERTNESS DIVERSITY AND INTERPERSONAL HELPING IN TEAMS: WHY THOSE WHO NEED THE MOST HELP END UP GETTING THE LEAST (2006, methodology): “Interpersonal helping was measured at time 3 with five items from Settoon and Mossholder’s (2002) interpersonal citizenship behavior scale.”
• The Michelangelo Phenomenon (2009, background): “…begin as temporary, interaction-specific adjustments become stable components of the self, such that over the course of extended interaction, close partners sculpt one another’s selves: People come to reflect what their partners ‘‘see in them’’ and ‘‘elicit from them’’ (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).”
• Toward a more complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect (2008, methodology): “…by interdependence theory (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959).1 Interdependence theory has been successfully used to integrate affect and cognition into theory (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003; Rusbult, Van Lange, Wildschut, Yovetich, & Verette, 2000), to model interdependent relationships (Kelley et al., 2003),…”
• Growing Followers: Exploring the Effects of Leader Humility on Follower Self‐Expansion, Self‐Efficacy, and Performance (2018, neutral): “…self-expansion than other forms of similarities (e.g., attitudes or personality similarity; Aron et al., 2006) because individuals usually rely on that biological information to make an initial assessment of the feasibility of building close relationships with others (Rusbult and Van Lange, 2003).”
• From Games to Giving: Social Value Orientation Predicts Donations to Noble Causes (2007, background): “competition. A case in point is interdependence theory, which explicitly assumes that social interaction needs to be understood in terms of not only concern with own outcomes (i.e., self-interest), but also broader social or interpersonal concerns, such as concern with joint outcomes, concern with p”
• Human Resource Systems and Helping in Organizations: A Relational Perspective (2011, neutral): “…& Ghoshal, 1998), psychological contracts (e.g., Dabos & Rousseau, 2004; Rousseau, 1995, 2004), interpersonal relations (e.g., Penner et al., 2005; Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003), interpersonal helping (e.g., Bowler & Brass, 2006; Flynn, 2006; Settoon & Mossholder, 2002), and relational capital…”