Common methods variance detection in business research

2,998 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Don't Just “Like” Me, Promote Me: How Attachment and Attitude Influence Brand Related Behaviors on Social Media (2018, background): “Although recent research suggests that common method variance does not represent a serious threat to the validity of survey research (Fuller et al. 2016), the same a priori procedures to minimize the potential for common method variance (Podsakoff et al.”
Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM (2020, background): “Even though common method variance does not bias model estimates of constructs at normally reported reliability levels (Fuller et al., 2016), specific research setting may call for its control.”
Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation (2021, neutral): “We also performed the Harman ’ s one-factor test (Fuller et al., 2016) and found that the first factor accounted for 45.5% of the variance (which is lower than the 50% threshold; Fuller et al. (2016).”
How Can the Celebrity Endorsement Effect Help Consumer Engagement? A Case of Promoting Tourism Products through Live Streaming (2021, methodology): “An EFA was performed on all potential variables using Harman’s one-factor test method [59].”