The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror-reasoning skill

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (2016, background): “Overall, this work suggests that more sophisticated epistemic beliefs relate to better argumentative reasoning skills (Weinstock, 2005, 2011; Weinstock & Cronin, 2003).”
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology (2011, unknown): “…model of epistemological beliefs, many researchers have explicitly drawn on this framework (e.g., Greene et al., 2008; Mason & Scirica, 2006; Muis, Bendixen, & Haerle, 2006; Muis & Franco, 2009; Qian & Alvermann, 2009; Stathopoulou & Vosniadou, 2007; Tsai, 2008; Weinstock & Cronin, 2003).”
Role of Epistemic Beliefs and Scientific Argumentation in Science Learning (2008, background): “These students were also more apt to use reasons and evidence to address the claims of others (Weinstock & Cronin, 2003 ).”
Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching (2004, background): “Justification for knowing includes how individuals consider what makes a sufficent knowledge claim both in the evaluation and production of knowledge (Weinstock & Cronin, 2003).”