How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture

By Gary P. Pisano, David J. Teece. 2007

472 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc7cc9f5bdb406c50258ebf80845eda42f251fa1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

- in-Progress (2012, unknown): “Traditionally, within large organizations innovation is measured in terms of economic gains from price, patents, and IP (Teece, 1986; Pisano and Teece, 2007; Sherry and Teece, 2004).”
Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness (2016, background): “…to be considered as primarily exogenously given and as such firms can influence the characteristics of their appropriability context by means of specific strategies and behaviours (Pisano, 2006; Pisano & Teece, 2007; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, 2011; Neuhaeusler, 2012; Milesi, Petelski, & Verre, 2013).”
The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes (2017, background): “These have received increasing attention more recently (Teece, 2006; Pisano and Teece, 2007; Teece, forthcoming).”
Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms (2016, background): “On the one hand, one group argues that appropriability mechanisms can help heterogeneous partners collaborate for innovation and that, in strong appropriability regimes (where imitation is difficult either because of strong formal appropriability mechanisms or difficult-to-imitate technology), firms”
Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation (2018, unknown): “, 2014), especially in the context of collaborative innovation (Pisano and Teece 2007; Lichtenthaler and Lichtenthaler, 2009).”
Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs (2010, background): “With innovation happening in different parts of the industry, a central actor must decide which technologies to incorporate into products, and then make those fast-changing elements work together in a product that is useful and affordable for customers (Pisano and Teece, 2007).”
The Internationalization of Corporate R&D: A Review of the Evidence and Some Policy Implications for Home Countries1 (2009, background): “At the same time, the interests of the established IP holders are likely to be divergent from those desiring to catch up, and sometimes it can even be in the interest of the incumbent firms to promote an open IP regime in one domain while defending a closed one in another (Pisano & Teece, 2007).”
Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises (2012, unknown): “A prominent strategy for earning money from innovations is through patenting (Gassmann 2006; Pisano and Teece 2007; Van de Vrande et al. 2009; Bianchi et al. 2010).”
The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions (2016, background): “…firms must scan both new technologies and current contracting arrangements to identify “bottlenecks” that may be controlled by changing technical dependencies and organizational ties to create new institutional arrangements (Jacobides et al., 2006; Pisano and Teece, 2007; Baldwin, 2015).”
Internal capabilities, network resources and appropriation mechanisms as determinants of R&D outsourcing (2015, background): “…formal ways, such as patenting, trademarks, confidentiality agreements and copyrights guaranteeing legal protection, to informal mechanisms, such as secrecy, complexity of product design and lead-time advantage over competitors (OECD, 2005; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2006; Pisano and Teece, 2007).”
Strategy as Evolution with Design: The Foundations of Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in the Economic System (2008, background): “In recent years, the role of product architecture in shaping enterprise architecture has been explored (Teece and Pisano 2007).”
An institution-based view of global IPR history (2017, background): “Firms and industry sectors can work to shape appropriability regimes even in countries with weak IPR (Keupp et al., 2012; Pisano & Teece, 2007).”