Formal and informal appropriation mechanisms: The role of openness and innovativeness

By Ann-Kristin Zobel, Boris Lokshin, John Hagedoorn. 2016

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1df1ad9747f2ba8514bdf53bb69ca181df9e1d3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Marcel Bogers

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Marcus Holgersson
2. Ove Granstrand
3. Marcel Bogers

In Strategy and Management

1. Marcus Holgersson
2. Ove Granstrand
3. Lars Bengtsson
4. Marcel Bogers
5. Ioana Stefan

Citations in the corpus

• Unravelling appropriability mechanisms and openness depth effects on firm performance across stages in the innovation process (2017, background): “Furthermore, recent studies signal the need for further investigation of appropriability and openness in regards to performance (Laursen and Salter, 2014), aswell as specific inquiry into the use of different types of IPPMs in various stages of the innovation process (Zobel et al., 2017).”
• The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes (2017, background): “…open innovation is related to knowledge sharing across firm boundaries, patents have an important role to play (Bogers, 2011; Zobel et al., 2016; Zobel et al., 2017) and are actually perceived as more important in open innovation settings than in closed innovation settings (Hagedoorn and Zobel,…”