Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity
By Melissa A. Schilling. 2000
1,487 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc59380da3bb1faddc302918b13f3fe306aa5016
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Satish Nambisan
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Fabrizio Salvador
- Carliss Y. Baldwin
- Kalle J. Lyytinen
- Sendil K. Ethiraj
- Youngjin Yoo
- Ola Henfridsson
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Carliss Y. Baldwin
- Nicolaj Siggelkow
- Daniel A. Levinthal
- Gautam Ahuja
- Sendil K. Ethiraj
- Jan W. Rivkin
- Mary Tripsas
- Koen Frenken
In Strategy and Management
- Satish Nambisan
- Ola Henfridsson
- Carliss Y. Baldwin
- Mary Tripsas
- Nicolaj Siggelkow
- Gautam Ahuja
- Michael G. Jacobides
- Daniel A. Levinthal
Citations in the corpus
- Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions (2005, background): “Others concentrate on a system’s ability to accept upgrades and re-use (Garud and Kumaraswamy, 1996), or on the forces that drive a system towards (e.g., demand heterogeneity) or away from (e.g., synergistic specificity) higher levels of modularity (Schilling, 2000).”
- The Incident Command System: High-Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task Environments (2001, background): “A system is modular to the extent that its components can be separated and recombined in various ways while system functionality relative to environmental demand is maintained or enhanced (Schilling, 2000).”
- Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code (2006, background): “…structure in the successful development of a firm's new products and services, the competitiveness of its product lines and the successful evolution of its technical capabilities (e.g., Eppinger et al, 1994; Ulrich, 1995; Sanderson and Uzumeri, 1995; Sanchez and Mahoney, 1996; Schilling, 2000).”
- Postponement: a review and an integrated framework (2004, background): “Modularity in organisation relates to those organisational processes, governance structures and contracting procedures that are adopted or utilised to accommodate modular production at both the intra- and inter-firm context ( Schilling, 2000”
- Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age (2018, background): “4 Modularity refers to the degree to which a product can be decomposed into components that can be recombined (Schilling 2000).”
- Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation (2003, background): “The decomposability of decision problems has recently attracted renewed attention in the literature on modularity (Schilling 2000).”
- Industry Change Through Vertical Disintegration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking (2005, background): “This evolution does not quite fit recent work on organizational theory and modularity (Baldwin & Clark, 2000; Schilling, 2000; Simon, 1962), which usually examines design problems from the perspective of a “system designer.”
- Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature (2020, positive): “…returns to adoption, it created strong incentives for producers to adopt standardized interfaces and a modular production system that would enable a wide range of third-party complement developers to create complements for a common platform (e.g., Matutes & Regibeau, 1988; Schilling, 1998, 2000).”
- Considering planned change anew:stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally and meaningfully (2011, background): “…change has to occur in an “all at once” punctuated equilibrium as opposed to more incrementally, may depend on issues to do with modularity, the extent to which a system’s components can be segregated and recombined and the tightness of coupling (Rivkin, 2000; Schilling, 2000; Siggelkow, 2001).”
- Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure (2010, background): “The crux of modular systems theory is that greater modularity facilitates rapid changes in individual subsystems by lowering the need for coordinated changes in others (Schilling 2000).”