Student Evaluation of Instructor: A Nomological Investigation Using Structural Equation Modeling

By Audhesh Paswan, Joyce A. Young. 2002

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f96923d7ca70c2940928a8bec3341ad7fc78cc40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance (2007, methodology): “This finding reveals the importance of the human factor and confirms that though students might place importance on the learned outcome, when they perceive teachers as investing in and giving attention to them, they react positively and become more interested (Paswan and Young, 2002).”
Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Students Learn? (2009, background): “As summarized by Paswan and Young (2002) at the conclusion of their study of business students, “Instead of asking instructors to improve teaching evaluations, schools should be asking themselves whether they should be asking instructors to make the course more or less demanding, interactive, or…”
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “For example, Paswan and Young (2002) reported that the factors Course Organization and Student-Instructor Interaction have a positive effect on the factors Instructor Involvement (.66 and .78, respectively) and Student Interest (.60 and .65), on the 21-item Student Instructional Rating System…”
Professor Brand Advocacy: Do Brand Relationships Matter? (2010, background): “…(Bailey, Gupta, & Schrader, 2000), evaluation measures (Clayson & Haley, 1990; Grunenwald & Ackerman, 1986; Herche & Swenson, 1991; Marks, 2000; Paswan & Young, 2002), student perceptions (Desai, Damewood, & Jones, 2001; Faranda & Clarke, 2004, Kelly, Conant, & Smart, 1991, Worthington, 2002),…”