The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: a meta-analysis

By Johannes Knoll, Jörg Matthes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016

522 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Celebrities frequently endorse products, brands, political candidates, or health campaigns. We investigated the effectiveness of such endorsements by meta-analyzing 46 studies published until April 2016 involving 10,357 participants. Applying multilevel meta-analysis, we analyzed celebrity endorsements in the context of for-profit and non-profit marketing. Findings revealed strong positive and negative effects when theoretically relevant moderators were included in the analysis. The most positive attitudinal effect appeared for male actors who match well with an implicitly endorsed object (d = .90). The most negative effect was found for female models not matching well with an explicitly endorsed object (d = −.96). Furthermore, celebrity endorsements performed worse compared to endorsements of quality seals, awards, or endorser brands. No publication bias was detected. The study has theoretical and practical implications, and provides an agenda for future research.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7f057c04c752cd08323e01fbadcb650707a18f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

  1. Justin Paul
  2. S. Bhakar

In Marketing

  1. Naeem Gul Gilal
  2. Faheem Gul Gilal
  3. Rukhsana Gul Gilal
  4. Justin Paul
  5. Lauren Grewal
  6. Robert W. Palmatier
  7. Andrew T. Stephen
  8. Noël Albert

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Lauren Grewal
  2. Justin Paul
  3. Robert W. Palmatier
  4. Naeem Gul Gilal
  5. Rukhsana Gul Gilal
  6. Faheem Gul Gilal
  7. Gil Appel
  8. Rhonda Hadi

Citations in the corpus