Perceptions of Group Cohesion and Mood in Sport Teams

By P. Terry, A. Carron, Mark J. Pink, A. Lane, Garland J. W. Jones, M. P. Hall. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7b75eb77b2cfe9d2ce84955403a0c422b51536c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Anne‐Kathrin Kleine
2. J. Hardy
3. Aidan P. Moran
4. B. Vogel
5. D. Lavallee
6. Robert R. Hirschfeld
7. A. Shirom
8. H. Zacher

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Mark A Eys
2. A. Carron
3. J. Hardy
4. Anne‐Kathrin Kleine
5. Aidan P. Moran
6. D. Lavallee
7. A. Shirom
8. H. Zacher

In Social Psychology

1. Michael S. Cole
2. Mark A Eys
3. C. Rudolph
4. B. Vogel
5. H. Zacher
6. A. Carron
7. J. Hardy
8. Anne‐Kathrin Kleine

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the Potential Disadvantages of High Cohesion in Sports Teams (2005, background): “Also, Terry et al. (2000) reported that athletes’ perceptions of social cohesion were associated with reduced tension and depression and increased vigor.”
• Emotions in Team Contact Sports: A Systematic Review (2012, unknown): “However, several studies report that players experience both positive and negative affects (Gaudreau et al., 2009; Hagtvet & Hanin, 2007; Hanin & Syrjä, 1995; Nicholls, Jones et al., 2009) and mood states (Polman et al., 2007; Terry et al., 2000; Terry, Walrond, & Carron, 1998).”
• Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis (2019, background): “Onlyif theytrusttheirworkpartners, individuals are able to immerse themselves in their work, become absorbed, and feel energized by it (Kahn, 1990), making trust an important prerequisite of vitality (Terry et al., 2000).”
• Explaining Vigor: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Vigor as a Positive Affect at Work (2007, background): “Specifically, work group cohesion was found to predict vigor, measured as a mood state (Terry et al., 2000).”
• Dispersion-Composition Models in Multilevel Research (2011, background): “…1: Group Cohesion and Negative Group-Affective Tone As the association between group cohesion and group-affective outcomes is widely acknowledged (George, 2002; Spoor & Kelly, 2004; Terry et al., 2000), it was selected as the basis for an initial illustration of the proposed framework (Table 1).”
• Sport Psychology: Contemporary Themes (2004, background): “Individual outcomes can include personal satisfaction along with improved personal states (for example self-esteem, selfefficacy, trust, reduced anxiety, increased role clarity, role acceptance and role performance) (Terry, 2000).”