10. RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES ON TEACHING ENGLISH AS A LINGUA FRANCA
By B. Seidlhofer. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2004
751 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5c28561523338bcc63f9bdf29eeb85387efc030
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- D. Larsen-Freeman
- Diane Belcher
- W. Baker
- Suresh Canagarajah
- Nick C. Ellis
- J. Flowerdew
- Steve Walsh
- Nicos Sifakis
In Language and Linguistics
- D. Larsen-Freeman
- W. Baker
- Nicos Sifakis
- Nick C. Ellis
- M. Charles
- Diane Belcher
- Deniz Ortaçtepe
- E. Kaypak
In Literature and Literary Theory
- W. Baker
- D. Larsen-Freeman
- Diane Belcher
- J. Flowerdew
- Deniz Ortaçtepe
- E. Kaypak
- Nicos Sifakis
- J. Jenkins
Citations in the corpus
- The Dynamics of Second Language Emergence: Cycles of Language Use, Language Change, and Language Acquisition (2008, background): “Seidlhofer (2004) described these changes as English is used across the world as a lingua franca.”
- Language learner beliefs and study abroad: A study on English as a lingua franca (ELF) (2014, background): “…this shift from focus on form to focus on meaning concurs with research that attempted to identify the language features that might be specific to ELF,4 it also 4 See Jenkins et al. (2011) and Seidlhofer (2004) for reviews on this issue. underlines the distinction between ESL and ELF communication.”
- Lingua receptiva (LaRa) – remarks on the quintessence of receptive multilingualism (2012, background): “In pertinent literature on lingua franca (Alptekin, 2010; House, 2003; Seidlhofer, 2004; Seidlhofer, Breiteneder, & Pitzl, 2006, p. 5), one distinguishes between top-down (fulfilling functions in various professional domains) and bottom-up (used by speakers from all levels of society in practically…”
- Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: empirical evidence from Spain (2019, background): “In the event students command terminology in the L2, but do not master the specific vocabulary in the L1, CLIL would be failing to meet the objectives envisaged by the European Union and could be contributing to English monolingualism (Phillipson 2003; Seidlhofer 2004).”
- An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in e-mails in English (2010, background): “…given the growth of English as a global language and the concomitant research focus on English as a lingua franca (ELF) (House 2003; Pickering 2006; Seidlhofer 2001, 2004), future research should also be directed at examining the e¤ect of speech act modification on message recipients in…”
- English for Specific Purposes: Teaching to Perceived Needs and Imagined Futures in Worlds of Work, Study, and Everyday Life (2006, background): “…as a form of domination, supporting the spread of English, and thus strengthening, in EFL settings, the hold of the developed world on the less developed (but see also Seidlhofer, 2004), and in ESL settings, aiding and abetting a too pervasive meltingpot process that effaces cultural identity.”
- Intercultural awareness: modelling an understanding of cultures in intercultural communication through English as a lingua franca (2011, background): “ELF studies offer a valuable source of data on intercultural communication through the establishment of increasingly large corpora including VOICE (Vienna Oxford International Corpus of English) (Seidlhofer, 2004 ; VOICE, 2011 ), the ELFA corpus (English as a Lingua Franca in Academic Settings) (M”
- The education of teachers of English as a lingua franca: a transformative perspective (2007, methodology): “(Seidlhofer 2004: 227–8) 358 w Nicos Sifakis © The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd In view of the above, ELF teacher education should stand for a radical change in the worldviews of ESOL teachers.”
- Multilingual Communication and Language Acquisition: New Research Directions. (2011, background): “The picture Khubchandani presents of multilingual communication in non-western communities is confirmed by the burgeoning research on lingua franca English (LFE) in diverse communities (see, for a state-of-the-art, Seidlhofer, 2004; Canagarajah, 2006).”
- The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English (2006, background): “For one thing, there may be little reason for a learner to attempt to emulate native-speaker norms (Cook 2002; Seidlhofer 2004), and for another, there is no fixed, homogeneous target end state to language evolution or development (Larsen-Freeman 2005).”
- Language Matters in Global Communication (2007, background): “Building on Seidlhofer (2001, 2004), some business discourse researchers have, indeed, departed from the ELF school of thought and started to discuss language in terms of “International English for Business Purposes,” or “International Business English (IBE)” (e.g., Bartlett & Johnson, 1998).”
- Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue (2006, background): “Of course, these features are also explicable socially, NICK C. ELLIS and DIANE LARSEN-FREEMAN 567 as can be seen in the study of English as a Lingua Franca and, with it, the awareness that correctness does not have to be commensurate with native speaker norms (Cook 2002; Jenkins 2000; Seidlhofer 20”